Pages
Friday, June 21, 2013
Analysis on Regional Interest of Web Search for www.indeed.com
American city Atlanta rises to the first place in web search volume for Indeed with rather slight advantages over its following cities Chicago, New York and Houston. Meanwhile, Dallas, Washington, Los Angeles rank from the fifth to the seventh on the list. London of UK and Paris of France are the last two members on the Top 9 list.
Seven of the nine cities are from the United States, which not only highlights Americans attachment to their home-based search engine, but also unveils the mutually beneficial relationship between job market and job hunters shaped by the highly developed Mass Media in the US. London and Paris’s emergence on the list probably shall be attributed to the Website’s commitment to expand major foreign markets in recent years since its establishment in 2004.
Headquartered in the United States, www.indeed.com is a single-topic vertical search engine for jobs and employment.
Thursday, June 13, 2013
www.Indeed.com the World's Largest Recruitment Job
Indeed has 100 million unique users per month, the world's largest recruitment job site. Indeed is across 50 countries, supports 26 languages, covering the areas of 94% of global GDP.
Since its creation in 2004, Indeed recruitment network job seekers provides millions of jobs information for free, which based on information from thousands of recruitment website, companies, and employment agency. As a leading charged according to effect of hiring promotion alliance, Indeed provides more than millions jobs in the field of candidates. For thousands of companies, Indeed is the most efficient channel.
Indeed is the Recruit group subsidiary, its founder is Paul Forster and Rony Kahan. The capital of Austin, Texas in the United States at Stanford, Connecticut mountain view, California, New York city, Dublin, Ireland and London have branches.
Job seekers could release their resume; therefore, the employers could find the best candidates. For employers, they could release information concerning companies, careers, and treatment for employees
Press Releases
Indeed announces Acquisition by Recruit Co. ltd September 25, 2012
Indeed Opens EMEA Headquarters in Dublin March 9, 2012
Indeed resume-Free, Open, Search. $1 Per Contact September 14, 2011
Since its creation in 2004, Indeed recruitment network job seekers provides millions of jobs information for free, which based on information from thousands of recruitment website, companies, and employment agency. As a leading charged according to effect of hiring promotion alliance, Indeed provides more than millions jobs in the field of candidates. For thousands of companies, Indeed is the most efficient channel.
Indeed is the Recruit group subsidiary, its founder is Paul Forster and Rony Kahan. The capital of Austin, Texas in the United States at Stanford, Connecticut mountain view, California, New York city, Dublin, Ireland and London have branches.
Job seekers could release their resume; therefore, the employers could find the best candidates. For employers, they could release information concerning companies, careers, and treatment for employees
Press Releases
Indeed announces Acquisition by Recruit Co. ltd September 25, 2012
Indeed Opens EMEA Headquarters in Dublin March 9, 2012
Indeed resume-Free, Open, Search. $1 Per Contact September 14, 2011
analysis of www.indeed.com search volume
analysis of www.indeed.com search volume

We can see from the chart,since January 2004 to September 2005,the search volume was little and there was no growth in the U.S.,and since then it had a slowly growth,and when it get to April 2010,it started to experience a fast growth,and reached its peak in May 2013,increase by more than 90% compared with 2004.
Georgia enjoys the highest search volume,the second is North Carolina,the next is south Carolina ,Illinois,Florida.So from the analysis,we can see that indeed is most popular in Georgia of the U.S. than any other cuontries across the world.

We can see from the chart,since January 2004 to September 2005,the search volume was little and there was no growth in the U.S.,and since then it had a slowly growth,and when it get to April 2010,it started to experience a fast growth,and reached its peak in May 2013,increase by more than 90% compared with 2004.
Georgia enjoys the highest search volume,the second is North Carolina,the next is south Carolina ,Illinois,Florida.So from the analysis,we can see that indeed is most popular in Georgia of the U.S. than any other cuontries across the world.
Related Words: Analysis Www.Indeed.Com Search
The best job in the world
In 2007, five years after graduating Northwestern with a degree in economics and communication, Nick Tilley quit his job as sales manager at a surgical firm and bought a one-way ticket to Oceania. After six years of travel and one well-received YouTube video, he may be on his way back Down Under.

Tilley, a resident of St. Louis, is one of 25 finalists vying for the position of Wildlife Caretaker in Tourism Australia’s annual Best Jobs in the World competition. If selected, he will spend the next year in South Australia caring for koalas, kangaroos, seals and sea lions while reacquainting himself with the land he calls "a home away from home" (Tilley studied abroad in Sydney as an undergraduate). All he has to do is prove to the nation’s largest tourism outlet that he’s the man for the job.
To get his name on the board, Tilley created an entry video about his experience with wildlife around the world. His video, and 149 others, were selected out of 600,000 entries. During his months backpacking and doing field work in New Zealand, Nepal, China, Southeast Asia and Africa, Tilley spent time with a wide spectrum of animals, including wombats, llamas, sea lions and sharks.
“I always seek out opportunities that let me interact with the wildlife because that’s what makes a place unique,” said Tilley, who owns no pets of his own but has developed a close bond with his neighbor’s African tortoise, Yoda. “I did a good job of highlighting my passion for wildlife as well as the international aspect of it.”
To draw more attention to his campaign and to help some wildlife in the process, Tilley has partnered with the Australian Koala Foundation, a nonprofit that works to preserve the koala’s natural habitat on the east coast. Through social media promotion and a large St. Louis fundraising event last week, Tilley has garnered more than $2,000 for the cause.
Lorraine O’Keefe of the AKF’s financial department said many people contact the organization about partnering but never actually raise any money. Tilley, on the other hand, has been AKF's biggest individual fundraiser to date.
“I rang him, and his enthusiasm came across,” O’Keefe said. “He sounded as if he had it all under control. He understands Australia because he’s been here. His money will be put towards our work, which also includes planting trees. But mainly to continue on with the National Koala Act. That’s our long-term goal.”
Nick’s older sister, Ryanne Tilley, works as a financial adviser in St. Louis and has been helping Nick with the business and public relations side of his campaign. She said the whole family is extremely proud and supportive and cannot wait to hear if he made the final three. That announcement will be made May 18, and the caretaker position will be awarded May 24.
Since Nick was a child, he always loved animals. Despite the fact that he is allergic to dogs and couldn’t have one, she said, he always played with every dog he saw and just took his inhaler. In Australia, he was the first to jump into the shark tank, despite a lifelong fear of sharks.
“He really can show throughout all of his travels how involved he gets with the wildlife,” she said. “He makes a point of doing that. Everything in life is exciting to him. He makes the most of every minute. He has this background that makes him a great candidate.”
Though the “Best Jobs in the World” campaign might seem like a marketing ploy, Nick Tilley hails Tourism Australia as a great resource for those visiting Australia for the first time.
“They do a tremendous job of trying to approach and appeal to anyone and everyone," Tilley said. "They do a really good job of promoting eco-friendly tourism. Take only photos, leave only footprints.”
And Tilley certainly has left footprints — not just in Australia but all over the world. When not on the trail, he runs his website, BackPackU, which offers trail maps and tips to those who want to travel off the beaten path. He’s done day trips on volcanoes and 17-day hikes through the Himalayans and is always learning from strangers along the way.
If he doesn’t get the job, Tilley plans to expand his website even further and continue to encourage others to travel. He advises NU students to visit the study abroad office as soon as possible.
“Get inspired. Get encouraged,” he said. “If you can’t travel now, travel vicariously. My experience in Sydney has given direction to my life. If you don’t quit and you don’t go, you’re always going to live with that regret. You only have one life. I don’t want to lose it living in a cubicle where what I’m doing doesn’t matter.”

Tilley, a resident of St. Louis, is one of 25 finalists vying for the position of Wildlife Caretaker in Tourism Australia’s annual Best Jobs in the World competition. If selected, he will spend the next year in South Australia caring for koalas, kangaroos, seals and sea lions while reacquainting himself with the land he calls "a home away from home" (Tilley studied abroad in Sydney as an undergraduate). All he has to do is prove to the nation’s largest tourism outlet that he’s the man for the job.
To get his name on the board, Tilley created an entry video about his experience with wildlife around the world. His video, and 149 others, were selected out of 600,000 entries. During his months backpacking and doing field work in New Zealand, Nepal, China, Southeast Asia and Africa, Tilley spent time with a wide spectrum of animals, including wombats, llamas, sea lions and sharks.
“I always seek out opportunities that let me interact with the wildlife because that’s what makes a place unique,” said Tilley, who owns no pets of his own but has developed a close bond with his neighbor’s African tortoise, Yoda. “I did a good job of highlighting my passion for wildlife as well as the international aspect of it.”
To draw more attention to his campaign and to help some wildlife in the process, Tilley has partnered with the Australian Koala Foundation, a nonprofit that works to preserve the koala’s natural habitat on the east coast. Through social media promotion and a large St. Louis fundraising event last week, Tilley has garnered more than $2,000 for the cause.
Lorraine O’Keefe of the AKF’s financial department said many people contact the organization about partnering but never actually raise any money. Tilley, on the other hand, has been AKF's biggest individual fundraiser to date.
“I rang him, and his enthusiasm came across,” O’Keefe said. “He sounded as if he had it all under control. He understands Australia because he’s been here. His money will be put towards our work, which also includes planting trees. But mainly to continue on with the National Koala Act. That’s our long-term goal.”
Nick’s older sister, Ryanne Tilley, works as a financial adviser in St. Louis and has been helping Nick with the business and public relations side of his campaign. She said the whole family is extremely proud and supportive and cannot wait to hear if he made the final three. That announcement will be made May 18, and the caretaker position will be awarded May 24.
Since Nick was a child, he always loved animals. Despite the fact that he is allergic to dogs and couldn’t have one, she said, he always played with every dog he saw and just took his inhaler. In Australia, he was the first to jump into the shark tank, despite a lifelong fear of sharks.
“He really can show throughout all of his travels how involved he gets with the wildlife,” she said. “He makes a point of doing that. Everything in life is exciting to him. He makes the most of every minute. He has this background that makes him a great candidate.”
Though the “Best Jobs in the World” campaign might seem like a marketing ploy, Nick Tilley hails Tourism Australia as a great resource for those visiting Australia for the first time.
“They do a tremendous job of trying to approach and appeal to anyone and everyone," Tilley said. "They do a really good job of promoting eco-friendly tourism. Take only photos, leave only footprints.”
And Tilley certainly has left footprints — not just in Australia but all over the world. When not on the trail, he runs his website, BackPackU, which offers trail maps and tips to those who want to travel off the beaten path. He’s done day trips on volcanoes and 17-day hikes through the Himalayans and is always learning from strangers along the way.
If he doesn’t get the job, Tilley plans to expand his website even further and continue to encourage others to travel. He advises NU students to visit the study abroad office as soon as possible.
“Get inspired. Get encouraged,” he said. “If you can’t travel now, travel vicariously. My experience in Sydney has given direction to my life. If you don’t quit and you don’t go, you’re always going to live with that regret. You only have one life. I don’t want to lose it living in a cubicle where what I’m doing doesn’t matter.”
From Bad Jobs to Good Jobs
What happened to the good jobs? This is the question posed by fast-food workers who walked out in New York and Chicago in recent weeks. It is the question posed by activists in those corners of the economy—including restaurants and domestic work and guest work—where the light of state and federal labor standards barely penetrates. And it is the question posed (albeit from a different set of expectations) by recent college graduates for whom low wages and dim prospects are the dreary norm.

There is no shortage of suspects for this sorry state of affairs. The stark decline of organized labor, now reaching less than 7 percent of private-sector workers, has dramatically undermined the bargaining power and real wages of workers. The erosion of the minimum wage, with meager increases overmatched by inflationary losses, has left the labor market without a stable floor. And an increasingly expansive financial sector has displaced real wages and salaries with speculative rent-seeking.
New work by John Schmitt and Janelle Jones at the Center for Economic and Policy Research recasts this question, posing it not as a causal riddle but as a political challenge: what would it take to get good jobs back?
Schmitt and Jones start with a basic distinction between good jobs (those that pay $19 an hour or better and offer both job-based health coverage and some retirement coverage) and bad jobs (those that meet none of these criteria). Each of these categories accounts for about a quarter of the workforce (the rest fall somewhere in between), with the share of good jobs slipping since 1979 and the share of bad jobs creeping up. The goal, by simulating the impact of different policy interventions, is to increase the share of good jobs and to eliminate—as much as possible—the bad jobs entirely.
Some policies—however salutary—would have little impact on this “good job-bad job” distribution. Raising the minimum wage, for example, would boost the earnings of 30 million workers, but it would do so by transforming bad jobs into not-quite-so-bad jobs. A worker earning $10 an hour without benefits, after all, is still pretty far removed from a good job.
The graphic below summarizes the findings of Schmitt and Jones, for men and women, for five policy changes. Gender pay equity, not surprisingly, would yield some small gains for women—a slightly higher percentage of good jobs, and slightly lower percentage of bad jobs. A 25 percent increase in college attainment yields only a modest improvement, a finding consistent with other research suggesting that wages are falling despite increasing educational attainment and not because there is some “skills” mismatch between available workers and available jobs.
What happened to the good jobs? This is the question posed by fast-food workers who walked out in New York and Chicago in recent weeks. It is the question posed by activists in those corners of the economy—including restaurants and domestic work and guest work—where the light of state and federal labor standards barely penetrates. And it is the question posed (albeit from a different set of expectations) by recent college graduates for whom low wages and dim prospects are the dreary norm.
There is no shortage of suspects for this sorry state of affairs. The stark decline of organized labor, now reaching less than 7 percent of private-sector workers, has dramatically undermined the bargaining power and real wages of workers. The erosion of the minimum wage, with meager increases overmatched by inflationary losses, has left the labor market without a stable floor. And an increasingly expansive financial sector has displaced real wages and salaries with speculative rent-seeking.
New work by John Schmitt and Janelle Jones at the Center for Economic and Policy Research recasts this question, posing it not as a causal riddle but as a political challenge: what would it take to get good jobs back?
Schmitt and Jones start with a basic distinction between good jobs (those that pay $19 an hour or better and offer both job-based health coverage and some retirement coverage) and bad jobs (those that meet none of these criteria). Each of these categories accounts for about a quarter of the workforce (the rest fall somewhere in between), with the share of good jobs slipping since 1979 and the share of bad jobs creeping up. The goal, by simulating the impact of different policy interventions, is to increase the share of good jobs and to eliminate—as much as possible—the bad jobs entirely.
Some policies—however salutary—would have little impact on this “good job-bad job” distribution. Raising the minimum wage, for example, would boost the earnings of 30 million workers, but it would do so by transforming bad jobs into not-quite-so-bad jobs. A worker earning $10 an hour without benefits, after all, is still pretty far removed from a good job.
The graphic below summarizes the findings of Schmitt and Jones, for men and women, for five policy changes. Gender pay equity, not surprisingly, would yield some small gains for women—a slightly higher percentage of good jobs, and slightly lower percentage of bad jobs. A 25 percent increase in college attainment yields only a modest improvement, a finding consistent with other research suggesting that wages are falling despite increasing educational attainment and not because there is some “skills” mismatch between available workers and available jobs.

There is no shortage of suspects for this sorry state of affairs. The stark decline of organized labor, now reaching less than 7 percent of private-sector workers, has dramatically undermined the bargaining power and real wages of workers. The erosion of the minimum wage, with meager increases overmatched by inflationary losses, has left the labor market without a stable floor. And an increasingly expansive financial sector has displaced real wages and salaries with speculative rent-seeking.
New work by John Schmitt and Janelle Jones at the Center for Economic and Policy Research recasts this question, posing it not as a causal riddle but as a political challenge: what would it take to get good jobs back?
Schmitt and Jones start with a basic distinction between good jobs (those that pay $19 an hour or better and offer both job-based health coverage and some retirement coverage) and bad jobs (those that meet none of these criteria). Each of these categories accounts for about a quarter of the workforce (the rest fall somewhere in between), with the share of good jobs slipping since 1979 and the share of bad jobs creeping up. The goal, by simulating the impact of different policy interventions, is to increase the share of good jobs and to eliminate—as much as possible—the bad jobs entirely.
Some policies—however salutary—would have little impact on this “good job-bad job” distribution. Raising the minimum wage, for example, would boost the earnings of 30 million workers, but it would do so by transforming bad jobs into not-quite-so-bad jobs. A worker earning $10 an hour without benefits, after all, is still pretty far removed from a good job.
The graphic below summarizes the findings of Schmitt and Jones, for men and women, for five policy changes. Gender pay equity, not surprisingly, would yield some small gains for women—a slightly higher percentage of good jobs, and slightly lower percentage of bad jobs. A 25 percent increase in college attainment yields only a modest improvement, a finding consistent with other research suggesting that wages are falling despite increasing educational attainment and not because there is some “skills” mismatch between available workers and available jobs.
What happened to the good jobs? This is the question posed by fast-food workers who walked out in New York and Chicago in recent weeks. It is the question posed by activists in those corners of the economy—including restaurants and domestic work and guest work—where the light of state and federal labor standards barely penetrates. And it is the question posed (albeit from a different set of expectations) by recent college graduates for whom low wages and dim prospects are the dreary norm.
There is no shortage of suspects for this sorry state of affairs. The stark decline of organized labor, now reaching less than 7 percent of private-sector workers, has dramatically undermined the bargaining power and real wages of workers. The erosion of the minimum wage, with meager increases overmatched by inflationary losses, has left the labor market without a stable floor. And an increasingly expansive financial sector has displaced real wages and salaries with speculative rent-seeking.
New work by John Schmitt and Janelle Jones at the Center for Economic and Policy Research recasts this question, posing it not as a causal riddle but as a political challenge: what would it take to get good jobs back?
Schmitt and Jones start with a basic distinction between good jobs (those that pay $19 an hour or better and offer both job-based health coverage and some retirement coverage) and bad jobs (those that meet none of these criteria). Each of these categories accounts for about a quarter of the workforce (the rest fall somewhere in between), with the share of good jobs slipping since 1979 and the share of bad jobs creeping up. The goal, by simulating the impact of different policy interventions, is to increase the share of good jobs and to eliminate—as much as possible—the bad jobs entirely.
Some policies—however salutary—would have little impact on this “good job-bad job” distribution. Raising the minimum wage, for example, would boost the earnings of 30 million workers, but it would do so by transforming bad jobs into not-quite-so-bad jobs. A worker earning $10 an hour without benefits, after all, is still pretty far removed from a good job.
The graphic below summarizes the findings of Schmitt and Jones, for men and women, for five policy changes. Gender pay equity, not surprisingly, would yield some small gains for women—a slightly higher percentage of good jobs, and slightly lower percentage of bad jobs. A 25 percent increase in college attainment yields only a modest improvement, a finding consistent with other research suggesting that wages are falling despite increasing educational attainment and not because there is some “skills” mismatch between available workers and available jobs.
www.Indeed.com Best Places to Work
Find jobs at the best companies to work for, as ranked by job seekers on the #1 job site.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)